Bibliography

Bibliography#

[Abe12]

Robert P Abelson. Statistics as principled argument. Psychology Press, 2012.

[AMB06]

Katharine G Abraham, Aaron Maitland, and Suzanne M Bianchi. Nonresponse in the american time use survey: who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? International Journal of Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5):676–703, 2006.

[AP14]

Joshua D Angrist and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. Mastering'metrics: The path from cause to effect. Princeton university press, 2014. URL: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/11221502.

[BHOConnell75]

P. J. Bickel, E. A. Hammel, and J. W. O'Connell. Sex bias in graduate admissions: data from berkeley. Science, 187(4175):398–404, 1975. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1739581 (visited on 2024-01-03).

[BLM22]

Luca Braghieri, Ro’ee Levy, and Alexey Makarin. Social media and mental health. American Economic Review, 112(11):3660–3693, 2022.

[Car83]

Shawn Carlson. Double-blind test of astrology. Nature, 1983.

[CC65]

William G Cochran and S Paul Chambers. The planning of observational studies of human populations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 128(2):234–266, 1965. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2344179.

[DVVB19]

Richard D De Veaux, Paul F Velleman, and Bock. Stats: Data and Models, 5th Edition. Pearson/Addison Wesley Boston, 2019.

[DC18]

Angus Deaton and Nancy Cartwright. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Social science & medicine, 210:2–21, 2018.

[FR99]

R.P. Feynman and J. Robbins. The Pleasure Of Finding Things Out: The Best Short Works Of Richard Feynman. Helix book. Basic Books, 1999. ISBN 9780738201085. URL: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/2450053.

[FPP07]

David Freedman, Robert Pisani, and Roger Purves. Statistics. WW Norton & Company, 4 edition, 2007. URL: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/6285515.

[Fre91]

David A Freedman. Statistical models and shoe leather. Sociological methodology, pages 291–313, 1991.

[Gal06]

D.W. Galenson. Old Masters and Young Geniuses: The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity. Princeton University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780691121093. URL: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/14140122.

[Gel18]

Andrew Gelman. Benefits and limitations of randomized controlled trials: a commentary on deaton and cartwright. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 210:48–49, 2018.

[GV21]

Andrew Gelman and Aki Vehtari. What are the most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years? Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(536):2087–2097, 2021.

[GR00]

Uri Gneezy and Aldo Rustichini. A fine is a price. The journal of legal studies, 29(1):1–17, 2000.

[Goo08]

Steven Goodman. A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions. In Seminars in hematology, volume 45, 135–140. Elsevier, 2008.

[GSR+16]

Sander Greenland, Stephen J Senn, Kenneth J Rothman, John B Carlin, Charles Poole, Steven N Goodman, and Douglas G Altman. Statistical tests, p values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. European journal of epidemiology, 31:337–350, 2016.

[Han08]

David J Hand. Statistics: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, USA, 2008. URL: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/14180088.

[Her09]

Cedric Herring. Does diversity pay?: race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American sociological review, 74(2):208–224, 2009.

[Her17]

Cedric Herring. Is diversity still a good thing? American Sociological Review, 82(4):868–877, 2017.

[KKM01]

Arne L Kalleberg, David Knoke, and Peter V Marsden. National Organizations Survey (NOS), 1996-1997. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research Ann Arbor, MI, 2001.

[Kna15]

Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic. Storytelling with data: A data visualization guide for business professionals. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

[KTX20]

Ron Kohavi, Diane Tang, and Ya Xu. Trustworthy online controlled experiments: A practical guide to a/b testing. Cambridge University Press, 2020.

[MB72]

John D May and Karl J Bemesderfer. Social and Political Inquiry: A Working Introduction to the Social Sciences. Duxbury Press, 1972.

[MJEL21]

Ellis P Monk Jr, Michael H Esposito, and Hedwig Lee. Beholding inequality: race, gender, and returns to physical attractiveness in the united states. American Journal of Sociology, 127(1):194–241, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/715141.

[RT19]

Lauren A Rivera and András Tilcsik. Scaling down inequality: rating scales, gender bias, and the architecture of evaluation. American Sociological Review, 84(2):248–274, 2019.

[Ros17]

Paul Rosenbaum. Observation and experiment: An introduction to causal inference. Harvard University Press, 2017. URL: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/15176619.

[Sch21]

Jonathan Schwabish. Better data visualizations: A guide for scholars, researchers, and wonks. Columbia University Press, 2021. URL: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/15473733.

[SMG+12]

Lisa L Shu, Nina Mazar, Francesca Gino, Dan Ariely, and Max H Bazerman. Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38):15197–15200, 2012.

[SNS21]

Uri Simonsohn, Leif D. Nelson, and Joe Simmons. 98: evidence of fraud in an influential field experiment about dishonesty. Data Colada, 2021. URL: https://datacolada.org/98.

[Sno49]

John Snow. On the mode of communication of cholera. John Churchill, 1849.

[Ste23]

Megan T. Stevenson. Cause, effect, and the structure of the social world. Boston University Law Review, 2023.

[SBL17]

Dragana Stojmenovska, Thijs Bol, and Thomas Leopold. Does diversity pay? a replication of herring (2009). American Sociological Review, 82(4):857–867, 2017.

[Str10]

Steven Strogatz. Chances are. New York Times, 2010. URL: https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/chances-are/.

[Tij12]

H. Tijms. Understanding Probability. Cambridge University Press, 2012. ISBN 9781107658561. URL: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/14195066.

[TK83]

Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological review, 90(4):293, 1983.

[Yul99]

G Udny Yule. An investigation into the causes of changes in pauperism in england, chiefly during the last two intercensal decades (part i.). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 62(2):249–295, 1899.